MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2407589037 · doi:10.3224/dms.v6i2

Public Private Partnership und Collaborative Governance

2013· paratext· de· W2407589037 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuedms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy Recht und Management · 2013
Typeparatext
Languagede
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicPublic-Private Partnership Projects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Investment BankUniversity of TorontoPhilipps-Universität MarburgGovernment of the United KingdomUniversity of TwenteUniversity of OxfordWissenschaftszentrum Berlin für SozialforschungBundesministeriums für Verkehr, Bau und StadtentwicklungErasmus Universiteit RotterdamTechnische Universität BraunschweigGeorgetown UniversityUniversity of CambridgeYale UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaSage Foundation
KeywordsGeneral partnershipCorporate governanceCollaborative governancePublic administrationBusinessPublic–private partnershipPolitical sciencePublic relationsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Die Euro-Rettung als Demokratieproblem 281

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.016
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0240.016
Open science0.0100.011
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.074

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it