MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2407999462

Interferon-gamma increases IL-6 production in human glioblastoma cell lines.

2001· article· en· W2407999462 on OpenAlexaff
Marc Hotfilder, Heike Knüpfer, G. Mohlenkamp, Petra Pennekamp, M. Knupfers, Stefaan Van Gool, Johannes Wolff

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGliomaCytokineImmune systemInterferon gammaCancer researchSecretionCell cultureBiologyTumor necrosis factor alphaReceptorInterferonImmunologyEndocrinologyBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Various immunotherapeutical approaches are presently evaluated for their efficacy to eradicate glioma cells. Complicating the concepts, these tumors secrete cytokines which modulate the immune response. MATERIALS & METHODS: We analyzed the influence of interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) on the cytokine production and IFN-gamma receptor expression in T98G and U87-MG human glioma cells. RESULTS: The IFN-gamma receptors were own-regulated after IFN-gamma treatment. Secretion of interleukin-6 (IL-6) protein was elevated by factors of 6.4 in T98G cells and 5.2 in U87-MG. Other cytokines were increased as well, but less constantly: IL-8, and VEGF were elevated significantly only in T98G, but not in U87-MG. Increases of IL-1 beta, IL-1 alpha and TGF beta-2 were only detectable at the mRNA level. TNF was not detectable in any of the cell lines, and TGF-beta, alpha FGF and HG were not influenced by IFN-gamma. CONCLUSION: IL-6 produced by glioma cells in response to IFN-gamma might support immune eradication of glioma cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207