MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2408474518

Federated Filtering Algorithm of Heading Angle Based on Magnetometer/GPS/IMU Integrated Navigation System

2013· article· en· W2408474518 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
X. Chen, Hang Guo, Hao Yin, Myeong‐Jong Yu, Jian Xiong

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 26th International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2013) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInertial measurement unitGlobal Positioning SystemHeading (navigation)Filter (signal processing)Extended Kalman filterComputer scienceNavigation systemGPS/INSKalman filterInertial navigation systemComputer visionAssisted GPSArtificial intelligenceMathematicsOrientation (vector space)GeographyGeodesyTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a federated filtering algorithm of heading angle based on Magnetometer (short for Mag)/GPS/IMU integrated navigation system has been designed. First of all, the advantage of Mag/GPS/IMU integrated navigation system and the main research contents of this paper have been introduced. Then the basic knowledge of federated filter has been introduced. At the third part, the algorithm of magnetic heading angle and the algorithm of combined heading angle of GPS/IMU integrated navigation system have been introduced. At the next part, EKF (Extended Kalman Filter) algorithm of Mag/GPS/IMU integrated navigation system has been presented to the reader in the forth part. Then federated filtering algorithm of Mag/GPS/IMU integrated navigation system has been introduced in the fifth part. The final part is to sum up the entire article. The paper focused on the subsystems of magnetometer navigation system and the subsystem of GPS, with IMU as the reference system. The federated filter consists of two sub-filters and the main filter. One sub-filter is the filter for magnetometer/IMU. In this sub-filter, the observed value is the heading angle difference between Mag and IMU. We can get the first state estimation matrix and its covariance matrix from the first sub-filter by EKF. The other sub-filter is the GPS/IMU filter. In this filter, the observed value is the heading angle difference between GPS and IMU. We can also get the second state estimation matrix and its covariance matrix from the second sub-filter by EKF. Then the time is updated and the output of sub-filters is integrated by the main filter. The globally optimal estimation of the heading angle of Mag/GPS/IMU integrated navigation system can be got by the main filter, and then feed back to the sub-filters according to the principle of information allocation. In this research, a vehicle experiment has been done. The experimental equipment is TPIM-10 got from Trusted Positioning Inc., Canada. This equipment is a kind of medium accuracy integrated navigation system. The calculating result of vehicle experiment data and the comparison of several algorithms show that the federated filtering algorithm is better than others. The accuracy of heading angle increased from 0.5932 deg of only Mag/GPS system to 0.1682 deg, while the algorithm can inhibit IMU error accumulation effectively. The fault tolerance and stability of federated filtering algorithm have been showed in this paper. Mag/GPS/IMU integrated navigation system is not only suitable for high and low dynamic, but also for static state. Moreover, the data processing by federated filtering algorithm can significantly improve the performance of the navigation system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 26th International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2013)Same topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207