MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2408777347

Health Funding: Calgary may provide health services in the UK

2004· article· en· W2408777347 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Louise Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Services Management and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRevenueMedicineHealth careStaffingFamily medicineLibrary scienceManagementBusinessNursingPolitical scienceFinanceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calgary health experts may soon be helping the UK tackle its waiting list woes — and in the process generate some revenue for services at home. The Anglo-Canadian Clinics Ltd., a consortium of British and Canadian companies, is the preferred bidder to provide ambulatory health care services at 2 regions. The British members include Accommodata Ltd. (housing), Bowner & Kirkland (construction) and Torex Medical Systems (computers). The Canadian interests include the Calgary Health Region, the University of Calgary Medical Group and Surgical Centres Inc. The UK is opening 21 high-volume diagnostic and treatment centres (see page 187) to alleviate elective surgery wait ing lists. The centres aim to add 250 000 cataract, joint replacement and minor surgical procedures by 2005. The Calgary consortium expects to export an undisclosed number of physicians, nurses and other health care workers to the UK to provide expertise in areas such as orthopedics. However, the faculty of medicine's executive director says this won't leave Calgary short handed. “There will be no net reduction [of staff],” said Paul Heinrich. “All are supernumerary.” The 2 contracts are slated to be signed in March and June so details are currently sparse, but there is certainly money to be made. The contracts will gross £70 million (Cnd$163 million) a year for 5 years. All the consortium's profits will be reinvested in the Alberta health system. Calgary's Dean of Medicine, Dr. Grant Gall, said the invitation to bid, which came at the request of the UK's health secretary, is “international recognition of what we do as an academic centre. If we can generate income while we do this, so much the better.” “Our primary reason for being involved in this is to be involved in international health,” adds Gall, who is a board member at the CHR. The project was spurred by the Don Mazankowski's report on Alberta's health care system which urged innovation in developing new revenue streams to finance health care. The Calgary–UK exchange also brings the possibility of recruiting UK staff to Calgary, says Gall. — Louise Gagnon, Ottawa

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicHealth Services Management and PolicyFrench-language works237,207