Isolation and Characterization of Clostridium difficile Toxin-Specific Single-Domain Antibodies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Camelidae single-domain antibodies (VHHs) are a unique class of small binding proteins that are promising inhibitors of targets relevant to infection and immunity. With VHH selection from hyperimmunized phage display libraries now routine and the fact that VHHs possess long, extended complementarity-determining region (CDR3) loop structures that can access traditionally immunosilent epitopes, VHH-based inhibition of targets such as bacterial toxins are being explored. Toxin A and toxin B are high molecular weight exotoxins (308 kDa and 269 kDa, respectively) secreted by Clostridium difficile that are the causative agents of C. difficile-associated diseases in humans and in animals. Here, we provide protocols for the rapid generation of C. difficile toxin A- and toxin B-specific VHHs by llama immunization and recombinant antibody/phage display technology approaches and for further characterization of the VHHs with respect to toxin-binding affinity and specificity and the conformational nature of their epitopes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".