MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2409065997

Coronary stenting without predilatation in a broad spectrum of clinical and angiographic situations.

2000· article· en· W2409065997 on OpenAlexaff
Chan Aw, Carere Rg, Naresh Solankhi, Arthur Dodek, Webb Jg

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTIMIStentFluoroscopyBalloonAngioplastyRight coronary arteryCircumflexUnstable anginaMyocardial infarctionCardiologyArteryRadiologyInternal medicineSurgeryCoronary angiographyThrombolysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Direct coronary stenting without balloon predilatation has the potential benefits of a reduced risk of extended dissections, reduced fluoroscopy exposure, reduced procedural time, and potential cost savings. With the availability of superior stents and delivery systems, we review our experience with direct stent deployments in a large selected patient cohort. METHODS: We prospectively studied 158 consecutive cases of attempted coronary stenting without balloon predilatation over a 1-year period. RESULTS: Indications for the procedure included unstable angina (71%), stable angina (24%) and acute myocardial infarction (5%). Target vessels were the anterior descending artery (56%), right coronary artery (30%), circumflex artery (8%), and vein grafts (6%). Pre-procedural TIMI flows were grade 3 (91.7%), grade 2 (5.8%), grade 1 (1.3%) and 0 (1.3%). Lesion types were graded A (27%), B (61%), and C (12%). Stent types included NIR Primo (80.4%), ACS Multi-Link RX Duet (10.1%), NIR (5.1%), and others (4.4%). Stents ranged from 3.0Eth 4.0 mm in diameter (median = 3 mm) and 8Eth 32 mm in length (median = 16 mm). Stents were successfully deployed in 155 cases (98.1%); 2 (1.3%) required predilatation and 1 (0.6%) deployed stent could not be expanded and was opened by rotablation. All except the rotablator case achieved final TIMI grade 3 flow, and 66% did not require further balloon dilatation. There were no deaths or cases of urgent bypass surgery. Case duration and radiation exposure in direct stenting (32.8 +/- 18.9 minutes and 6.7 +/- 6.2 minutes, respectively) compared favorably to those in a matched group of patients in conventional stenting (47 +/- 18 minutes and 11 +/- 7 minutes) and coronary angioplasty (40 +/- 12 minutes and 10 +/- 6 minutes) for single-lesion cases (p < 0.005). Creatine kinase elevation related to the procedure was observed in 5 patients. Subacute stent thrombosis occurred in 2 (1.3%) cases. CONCLUSION: Direct coronary stenting was successfully and safely accomplished in a variety of clinical situations in selected patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207