MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2410015784

Morphological variations of Hymeniacidon perlevis in north Atlantic and China Yellow Sea

2008· article· en· W2410015784 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
曲翊, DanielaHankel, DorteJanussen, Wei Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSponge spiculeSpiculeSpongeBiologyPaleontologyGeologyZoology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sponges (Porifera) are among the most diverse phylum of the 28\naquatic invertebrate phyla, in terms of the numbers of species and\ntheir morphological characters (Hooper and Van Soest, 2002). The\nsponge polymorphism (i.e. morphological variations) is often considerable,\nwhich has been suggested to be related to environmental\nimpacts (Bell and Barnes, 2000; Palumbi, 1986; Meroz-Fine et al.,\n2005). As one of the most common species in the tidal and shallow\nsub-tidal waters of Europe, Hymeniacidon perlevis was firstly\ndescribed in 1818. We have reported since 2002 the occurrence of\nH. perlevis in China Yellow Sea of Northern China. It is of interest\nto compare the morphological and spicule characteristics between\nthese two species in order to understand the polymorphism of H.\nperlevis. Spicules were prepared by dissolution of the soft tissue\nof sponge fragments in nitric acid and studied by light microscopy\nafter mounting in Canada balsam on slides and by SEM after sputtering\non stubs, respectively. In the two specimens, the spicules\nare all style type (monaxon spicule with one end pointed, the\nother blunt), however distinctive differences were observed in the\nspicule dimensions. The spicule size of H. perlevis from Atlantic\nOcean is 100–520 m in length and 1.6–8.8 m in width; while\nthe H. perlevis from China Yellow Sea is 110–390 m in length and\n1.6–9.6 m in width. In Atlantic specimen, the spicules in cortex\nare smaller than outer layer. The average size of spicules in cortex\nis 247.55±5.29 mto 268.75±5.9 min length, 4.03±0.08 mto\n4.10±0.08 m in width, while the size of spicules in choanosomal\nis 278.61±6.36 m to 259±6.05 m in length, 4.27±0.10 m to\n4.16±0.10 m in width. In China Yellow Sea specimen, the spicule\nsize in cortex is 224.33±3.29 m to 224.47±3.11 m in length,\n4.52±0.12 m to 4.60±0.10 m in width, while the spicule size\nin choanosomal is 221.87±3.26 m to 221.28±3.36 m in length,\n4.26±0.10 m to 4.60±0.12 m in width, One-way ANOVA show\nthe differences are not significant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine Biology and Environmental ChemistryFrench-language works237,207