Intralipid-Induced Decrease in Oxygenation in Neonates IsRelated to Changes in the Respiratory Quotient
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intravenous lipid infusion has been previously reported to be associated with hypoxemia. Different mechanisms have been proposed, but none have explored the decrease in respiratory quotient (RQ) following lipid administration as a possible factor. Ten neonates without respiratory problems, breathing room air and on total parenteral nutrition were studied. Arterialized capillary blood gases, transcutaneous PO2 (TcPO2) measurements and expired gas concentrations were obtained, prior to and 1 g/kg of 10% lipid emulsion was infused over 6 h. Following lipid infusion, the TcPO2 decreased from 72 +/- 8 to 65 +/- 8 mm Hg and the RQ decreased from 0.94 +/- 0.08 to 0.86 +/- 0.5 (p less than 0.05), while the pH, PaCO2 and the alveolar-arterial oxygen tension difference did not change. The decrease in TcPO2 significantly correlated with the decrease in alveolar oxygen tension. Seven of the 10 infants had a significant decrease in TcPO2 with a significant decrease in RQ from 0.98 +/- 0.05 to 0.85 +/- 0.06 (p less than 0.01). In 3 patients with no significant change in TcPO2 following intralipid administration, the RQ was initially significantly lower than the rest of the group (0.85 +/- 0.04; p less than 0.05) and did not change at the end of the infusion (0.88 +/- 0.03). These data suggest that the changes in PaO2 following lipid infusion in neonates without lung disease and breathing room air, are related to the decrease in alveolar oxygen tension secondary to the change in RQ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".