MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2410098808 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2015-0545

Interpretation of soil property profile from limited measurement data: a compressive sampling perspective

2016· article· en· W2410098808 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yu Wang, Tengyuan Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompressed sensingProperty (philosophy)Sampling (signal processing)Geotechnical engineeringData collectionEngineeringComputer scienceSoil scienceMathematicsData miningAlgorithmGeologyStatisticsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Variation of soil properties with depth, i.e., the soil property profile, is a key input in geotechnical design and analysis, and it is determined during geotechnical site characterization. Determination of such a soil property profile requires extensive measurement data points from site characterization. However, the number of measurement data points from geotechnical site characterization is usually sparse and limited. As such, determining the soil property profile from a limited number of measurement points remains a challenge to geotechnical engineers. In engineering practice, the soil property profile is frequently determined with the assistance of engineering experience and judgment or statistical methods when only limited measurement data are available. Because both methods inevitably involve either subjectivity or assumptions that might contradict reality, the derived profile might not reflect the real variation of soil properties with depth. This paper aims to address this problem and develop an objective and rational approach to interpret the soil property profile from limited measurement data. The proposed approach is based on a novel sampling theory, called compressive sampling (or compressive sensing, CS), in mathematics and signal processing. Using compressive sampling, a high-resolution signal (e.g., a soil property profile in this study) can be reconstructed from a limited number of measurement data points. The reconstructed soil property profile is nearly continuous and has a resolution as high as cone penetration test (CPT) data. As it contains a large number of data points, conventional statistical methods can be applied easily. In this paper, the proposed approach is illustrated and validated using a set of real CPT data (i.e., tip resistance, qc). The results show that the proposed approach reasonably reconstructs the complete qc profiles from a limited number of qc data points.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations102
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207