MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P07.02 Evaluation of the hologic transcription mediated amplification assay for detection of<i>mycoplasma genitalium</i>from urine samples

2015· article· en· W2410270151 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah J. Tabrizi, Costa Am, Jenny Su, Penelope C. Lowe, Catriona S. Bradshaw, CK Fairley, SM Garland

Bibliographic record

VenueSexually Transmitted Infections · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMycoplasma genitaliumCervicitisMedicineUrethritisUrineGynecologyChlamydia trachomatisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> <i>M. genitalium</i> is an emerging sexually transmitted pathogen, with a strong association with urethritis, cervicitis and pelvic inflammatory disease. Detection of this bacterium by routine culture is not practical and routine diagnosis and screening for <i>M. genitalium</i> by molecular techniques has been hampered by lack of readily available commercial assays. A preliminary version of a commercial amplification assay is currently available on the Panther platform and was evaluated against an in-house qPCR assay currently in use for routine diagnostics. <h3>Methods</h3> Overall 1000 consecutive urine samples from men and women were utilised for this evaluation. Over the course of 3 months, urine samples were obtained from consecutive symptomatic men and women being screened for <i>M. genitalium</i> at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, as well as women being screened prior to termination of pregnancy at the Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne. The primary Hologic assay targeting 80bp region of 16s rRNA was compared to the in-house diagnostic assay which targets a 517bp region of 16S gene, as well as a second 16s rRNA target available on the Hologic platform. <h3>Results</h3> The comparison of the two targets available on the Hologic platform showed very high correlation (k = 0.97 95% CI 0.93–1.00). Comparison of primary Hologic assay to in-house 16S qPCR assay, also showed very good correlation (K = 0.84 95% CI 0.75–0.93). Overall, both primary and secondary Hologic assays on Panther were more sensitive than the 16S qPCR for detection of <i>M. genitalium</i> in urine specimens. <h3>Conclusion</h3> The <i>M. genitalium</i> assay on the Hologic platform integrated well with the laboratory procedures allowing rapid testing and possibility of rapid and accurate reporting using integration with laboratory information system. Overall the Hologic assay for detection of <i>M. genitalium</i> offers a simple, accurate and sensitive platform for diagnostic laboratories for detection of this important upcoming pathogen. <h3>Disclosure of interest statement</h3> Hologic supplied the diagnostic kits and the Panther platform to conduct this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.731

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexually Transmitted InfectionsSame topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207