MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2410331337

The impact of Malarone and primaquine on psychomotor performance.

2003· article· en· W2410331337 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michel A Paul, Anne McCarthy, Neil E. Gibson, Gord Kenny, Tim Cook, Gary Gray

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMalaria Research and Control
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimaquinePsychomotor learningMedicineDosingMalariaCrossover studyPlaceboProguanilAnesthesiaPediatricsPharmacologyPsychiatryChloroquine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Recent evidence has established the effectiveness of Malarone and primaquine for chemoprophylaxis against Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Both have the advantage of providing causal prophylaxis and therefore require continued dosing for only 1 wk after departure from a malaria endemic area. Canadian Forces aircrews are often placed in situations that put them at risk for malaria infection but the safety of these drugs for use in aircrew has not been ascertained. This study was undertaken to determine whether or not Malarone or primaquine impact psychomotor performance. METHOD: Twenty-eight subjects (20 men and 8 women) ranging from 21 to 52 yr of age were assessed for psychomotor performance on 2 psychomotor test batteries at the end of a 7-d dosing protocol for each of placebo, Malarone, and primaquine treatment, in a double-blind crossover design with counterbalanced treatment order. All subjects were also assessed for psychomotor performance once per week during the 3-wk washout intervals. The daily Malarone dose was atovaquone 250 mg/proguanil 100 mg and the daily primaquine dose was 30 mg of base. In order to verify subject compliance with the medication dosing protocol, blood samples were drawn from all subjects at the end of each of the three 7-d loading protocols. All three medications were packaged in identical gelatin capsules for blinding purposes. At each psychomotor test session, all subjects completed a drug side-effect questionnaire, a mood questionnaire, and a sleepiness/fatigue questionnaire. RESULTS: There was no significant impact of Malarone or primaquine on serial reaction time, logical reasoning, serial subtraction, or multitask performance. With respect to drug adverse effects there were no significant main effects or interactions for the documented adverse effects of these medications (abdominal cramps, epigastric distress, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, headache, coughing and dizziness). CONCLUSIONS: There was no impact of either Malarone or primaquine on psychomotor performance, mood, sleepiness, or fatigue. The usual adverse effects of these medications were not significantly manifested in our subjects. These findings support the possible use of either Malarone or primaquine in aircrew for malaria chemoprophylaxis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.135

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicMalaria Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207