MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2410403154

[Left ventricular systolic function in patients with refractory angina pectoris treated with percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation, results of long-term follow-up].

2004· article· en· W2410403154 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Krzysztof Żmudka, Jarosław Trębacz, Piotr Podolec, Maria Olszowska, Marta Hlawaty, Magdalena Kostkiewicz, Paweł Rudziński, Jerzy Sadowski, Wiesława Tracz, Dariusz Dudek, Jacek S. Dubiel

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEjection fractionCardiologyDobutamineAnginaCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyInternal medicineRefractory (planetary science)Heart rateBlood pressureHeart failureHemodynamicsMyocardial infarction
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMLR) has been developed for treatment of patients with refractory angina pectoris. This study was designed to evaluate long-term impact of PMLR on left ventricular systolic function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients with refractory angina pectoris who underwent PMLR were studied with dobutamine stress echocardiography before procedure, at early follow-up after 1-3 months and at long-term follow-up after 2-3 years post procedure. Wall motion score index (WMSI) and ejection fraction (EF) were calculated at rest as well during infusion of dobutamine with low and high rate. RESULTS: Mean WMSI at rest decreased significantly from 1.71 +/- 0.24 before PMLR to 1.55 +/- 0.21 at early follow-up (p=0.0189) and 1.48 +/- 0.26 (p=0.009) at long-term follow-up. Mean WMSI during low-rate dobutamine infusion decreased significantly from 1.39 +/- 0.29 to 1.25 +/- 0.25 (p=0.0276) at early follow-up, but was not significantly different in long-term. Mean WMSI during high-rate dobutamine infusion decreased significantly from 1.83 +/- 0.21 before PMLR to 1.56 +/- 0.2 at early follow-up and 1.57 +/- 0.29 (p<0.03) at long-term evaluation. Mean EF at rest increased significantly from 48 +/- 8.6% before PMLR to 56.9 +/- 7.9% (p=0.0189) at early follow-up. At long-term follow-up mean EF at rest was 52.7 +/- 8.3% and was not significantly different from baseline. Mean EF during low-rate dobutamine infusion was not significantly different from baseline both at early and long-term follow-up. Mean EF during high-rate dobutamine infusion increased significantly from 44.5 +/- 8.6% before PMLR to 58.1 +/- 7.0% (p=0.0093) at early follow-up while in long-term it was 51.3 +/- 9.8%, which was not significantly different from baseline. These changes were accompanied by significant decrease of mean CCS score from 3.52 +/- 0.51 before procedure to 2.54 +/- 0.78 (p<0.0001) after 1 month and 2.78 +/- 0.65 after 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with refractory angina pectoris treated with PMLR significant early improvement of systolic left-ventricular function is observed with trend toward improvement in long-term. It is accompanied with significant long-term angina relief.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→French-language works237,207→