JNPT Special Topic Issues—Translational Research and Educational Resources
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The June and September issues of JNPT will be dedicated to the Special Issue titled: “Promoting Optimal Function after Spinal Cord Injury.” Special Topic Issues are an important contribution of our journal. We have used them as an opportunity to synthesize information related to a topic that typically spans the basic to applied science continuum culminating with clinical application. This type of translation process describes our journal's mission and is crystallized in the special issues. I would like to suggest that the journal and its' special issues serve as a feedback mechanism enhancing the disciplines that inform neurologic physical therapy. Neurologic physical therapy is informed by many disciplines and in turn can influence the direction of these disciplines. Our special issues highlight this synergy. In a 1999 Special Topic issue on Neuroplasticity, basic scientist Dr. Randy Nudo, PhD, published his work. Several years later at a program in our Combined Sections Meeting, Dr. Randy Nudo returned to neurologic physical therapy community. It was evident from his presentation and direct reference, that our colleague Pamela Duncan, PT, PhD, FAPTA had influenced his work. By introducing questions and issues that are relevant to physical therapists, she drove questions in basic science. This is only one example of the many 2-way interactions that neurologic physical therapists are having with individuals in other fields. Thus, what we write and publish in JNPT is of interest not only to physical therapists, but also to individuals in allied fields. Special Topic Issues become a valuable resource for physical therapy educators and students in the international physical therapy community. While there are several texts that can be used for neurologic physical therapy instruction, none, in my opinion can be used by itself. Special Topic Issues supplement these texts and in some cases supersede them. We receive requests from all over the world for special topic issues such as the ones we published on Parkinson Disease, Degenerative Diseases Across the Continuum of Care, Complementary Therapies, and Use of Te chnology. This is not surprising as many of the contributors to these issues are physical therapists or scientists who live outside the United States. In fact the Special Issue on Degenerative Diseases was co-edited by Lori Quinn from the USA and Meg Morris of Australia. I am especially fond of Special Topic Issues as they provide the opportunity for members of our profession that may not be associated with the journal to take the lead in organizing and producing the journal. Alternatively, and equally pleasing to me, individuals associated with the journal, may shepherd the issue, as is the case with this special topic issue. Ultimately, it is the privilege and obligation of the individual producing the special issue to synthesize and integrate relevant information on a topic to advance the field of neurologic physical therapy. In this special topic issue Edelle Field-Fote from the USA and Carol Richards from Canada (both on our Editorial Board), continue the tradition of the special topic issues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".