Conceptual Design of a Cervical Disc and Facet Joint Arthroplasty System Made From PEEK
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The cervical spine provides structural support and motion through flexible intervertebral discs along with articulating synovial facet joints. In response to severe disc degeneration, arthroplasty devices attempt to both replace the disc and restore normal motion. However, after disc arthroplasty, facet joint loads can increase during extension [1]. The clinical significance of these increased forces is not known but disc arthroplasty has yet to show significantly improved clinical outcomes compared to fusion and debate continues regarding the reasons [2]. It is hypothesized that expanding the arthroplasty approach to include the facet joints may be one way to eventually improve clinical performance. Natural cervical spinal motion is produced by disc and facet interaction that occurs about a transient helical axis whose center of rotation changes [3]. Current disc replacements do not completely accommodate this motion and thus could be modified along with the option of added facet joint implants to give a cervical total level arthroplasty system (CTLAS). The purpose of the present study was to initiate the development of CTLAS by proposing a conceptual design. METHODS An engineering design procedure was applied to develop a system to restore natural kinematics, load sharing and motion of the cervical spine via CTLAS. Importance was also placed on post-operative imaging but the issue of fixation in bone was not addressed at this time. The instantaneous centers of rotation and the helical axes of the cervical spine were mapped. While developing the conceptual design of CTLAS, ongoing wear tests of PEEK-on-PEEK articulations were being performed using an Ortho-POD pin-on-disc apparatus (AMTI, Watertown, MA, USA) to explore the suitability of using this material. RESULTS A modular CTLAS was developed to treat disc and facet degeneration (Fig. 1). A semi-constrained bearing, that replicated the motion produced by the helical axis, was proposed for the disc while a surface replacement design was proposed for the facet joints. Axial rotation and lateral bending are coupled, as in the natural spine, by permitting motion about non-fixed instantaneous centers of rotation with some anterior-posterior translation. In this conceptual CTLAS design, carbon fiber reinforced PEEK was proposed as the sole material because, among other advantageous features, it has low wear [4, 5, 6] and does not interfere with post-operative imaging. DISCUSSION Proactive design improvement to include the unique characteristics of the cervical spine has the possibility of improving outcomes for spinal disc arthroplasty. The ability to replace facets could allow some candidates for fusion to be treated with arthroplasty. Provided adequate fixation can be achieve, the CTLAS conceptual design has the potential to offer better replication of natural kinematics, sequential application of facet joint implants and excellent post-operative imaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".