MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2410695734

Conceptual Design of a Cervical Disc and Facet Joint Arthroplasty System Made From PEEK

2018· article· en· W2410695734 on OpenAlexaff
G. Daniel G. Langohr, John B. Medley

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacet (psychology)ArthroplastyIntervertebral discInstant centre of rotationFacet jointPeekOrthodonticsMedicineDiscectomyComputer scienceRotation (mathematics)SurgeryMaterials scienceLumbarArtificial intelligencePsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION The cervical spine provides structural support and motion through flexible intervertebral discs along with articulating synovial facet joints. In response to severe disc degeneration, arthroplasty devices attempt to both replace the disc and restore normal motion. However, after disc arthroplasty, facet joint loads can increase during extension [1]. The clinical significance of these increased forces is not known but disc arthroplasty has yet to show significantly improved clinical outcomes compared to fusion and debate continues regarding the reasons [2]. It is hypothesized that expanding the arthroplasty approach to include the facet joints may be one way to eventually improve clinical performance. Natural cervical spinal motion is produced by disc and facet interaction that occurs about a transient helical axis whose center of rotation changes [3]. Current disc replacements do not completely accommodate this motion and thus could be modified along with the option of added facet joint implants to give a cervical total level arthroplasty system (CTLAS). The purpose of the present study was to initiate the development of CTLAS by proposing a conceptual design. METHODS An engineering design procedure was applied to develop a system to restore natural kinematics, load sharing and motion of the cervical spine via CTLAS. Importance was also placed on post-operative imaging but the issue of fixation in bone was not addressed at this time. The instantaneous centers of rotation and the helical axes of the cervical spine were mapped. While developing the conceptual design of CTLAS, ongoing wear tests of PEEK-on-PEEK articulations were being performed using an Ortho-POD pin-on-disc apparatus (AMTI, Watertown, MA, USA) to explore the suitability of using this material. RESULTS A modular CTLAS was developed to treat disc and facet degeneration (Fig. 1). A semi-constrained bearing, that replicated the motion produced by the helical axis, was proposed for the disc while a surface replacement design was proposed for the facet joints. Axial rotation and lateral bending are coupled, as in the natural spine, by permitting motion about non-fixed instantaneous centers of rotation with some anterior-posterior translation. In this conceptual CTLAS design, carbon fiber reinforced PEEK was proposed as the sole material because, among other advantageous features, it has low wear [4, 5, 6] and does not interfere with post-operative imaging. DISCUSSION Proactive design improvement to include the unique characteristics of the cervical spine has the possibility of improving outcomes for spinal disc arthroplasty. The ability to replace facets could allow some candidates for fusion to be treated with arthroplasty. Provided adequate fixation can be achieve, the CTLAS conceptual design has the potential to offer better replication of natural kinematics, sequential application of facet joint implants and excellent post-operative imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity→French-language works237,207→