Contact Sensitization by Age Group in Adults: Patch-Test Data from the Massachusetts General Hospital, 1996 to 2006
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Allergic contact sensitization may occur at any age, showing specific rates of sensitization and allergen frequency related to periods of life. OBJECTIVE: To describe sensitization rates of specific allergens with respect to age distribution in adults in a cross-sectional study. METHODS: Data of 713 patients referred for patch testing at the Massachusetts General Hospital Contact Dermatitis Clinic were analyzed. Testing was conducted with baseline (29 allergens) and customized series between January 1996 and December 2006. RESULTS: Although trends were noted, there was no statistically significant difference with respect to rate of sensitization or number of positive allergens in the various age groups. Fragrance mix and nickel sulfate were the most common allergens through all age groups. In older age groups, a statistically significant higher sensitization rate was shown for fragrance mix (p = .005) and balsam of Peru (p < .005) whereas the rate for nickel was lower (p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: For specific allergens such as nickel and fragrances, significant variations occur in different stages of life. Even with these variations, we found that the overall rates of positive patch-test reactions were similar in the three age groups evaluated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".