MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2410794465

Victorian Order of Nurses Fonds, 1946-1963 (non-inclusive)

2016· article· en· W2410794465 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anne Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWifeCharterService (business)MedicineNursingOrder (exchange)Political scienceFamily medicineBusinessLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Victorian Order of Nurses was established by Royal Charter in 1897 by Lady Aberdeen, wife of the then Governor-General to provide home care nursing to anyone who was in need of it. There were branches from Newfoundland to the Pacific Coast and each branch had a board of directors. The St. Catharines branch was founded in 1919 and the Lincoln County branch was organized in 1947. The V.O.N. was funded by public subscription, donations from industry, municipal grants and contributions from clubs and organizations. The service was offered to anyone in need at below cost, but nobody was ever refused because they were unable to pay. The services provided included: medical and surgical aid; dressings; compresses; care of convalescents, the chronically ill or the aging; care of maternity patients; pre-natal instruction and care of mother and baby. All V.O.N. nurses were graduates of accredited schools and were registered nurses. Most of the nurses had also taken a course in public health nursing. The V.O.N. has been instrumental in helping Canadians through the two World Wars and the Halifax Explosion. In 2005, the VON, was the largest single, national homecare organization. It is structured into a national service provider and local charities which are governed by volunteer Board members. The National Board is comprised of volunteers which are elected by the representatives of the local branches. On November 25, 2015, VON shut down all of their operations outside of Ontario and Nova Scotia due to a lack of funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score0.731

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0590.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University)Same topicNursing Education, Practice, and LeadershipFrench-language works237,207