MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2411125742 · doi:10.1089/thy.2016.0036

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Papillary Thyroid Cancer Undergoing Remnant Ablation with 30 milliCuries Radioiodine

2016· article· en· W2411125742 on OpenAlex
Muhammad Mujammami, Michael P. Hier, Richard J. Payne, Louise Rochon, Michael Tamilia

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThyroid · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThyroid carcinomaThyroid cancerThyroidSingle CenterPapillary thyroid cancerPapillary carcinomaSurgeryClinical endpointInternal medicineUrologyStage (stratigraphy)Randomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The study considered the long-term outcome of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma treated with 30 mCi radioiodine. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to define and compare the remission rates of papillary thyroid carcinoma ablated with 30 mCi (131)I prepared by either thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) or recombinant human thyrotropin (rhTSH; Thyrogen(®)), and to identify variables predictive of a favorable prognosis. METHOD: An observational study was conducted at an academic medical center and a comparative summary of six studies is presented. Three hundred and seventy patients (THW group, n = 203; rhTSH group, n = 167) were recruited from a prospectively managed registry. The mean follow-up was 9.3 years (range 5.1-15.8 years) in the THW group and 7.1 years (range 5.0-9.7 years) in the rhTSH group. The primary endpoint was the long-term remission rates (no evidence of disease) in the THW group compared with the rhTH group. RESULTS: The response at 12-18 months after 30 mCi remnant ablation was excellent in 79.3% and 76.0% of patients in the THW group and the rhTSH group, respectively (p > 0.05). The long-term remission rates also did not significantly differ between both groups at 95.6% and 97.0%. Although the surveillance period for the THW group exceeded that of the rhTSH group, no significant difference in recurrence-free survival was discerned by the Kaplan-Meier curves. In a multivariate analysis, an excellent response to therapy at 12-18 months correlated significantly with long-term remission rates in the THW group (p = 0.031, odds ratio [OR] = 2.6 [confidence interval (CI) 1.1-6.0]), the rhTSH group (p = 0.03, OR = 5.3 [CI 1.2-23.8]), and the pooled groups (p = 0.001, OR = 3.43 [CI 1.63-7.2]). The pre-ablation thyroglobulin level significantly correlated with remission rates only in the THW group (p = 0.035, OR = 5.5 [CI 1.1-27.1]). CONCLUSIONS: The response to remnant ablation with 30 mCi radioiodine is often excellent, and the long-term remission rates can be expected to be high, independent of the method of delivery (i.e., THW or rhTSH).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.640

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it