The mosaic valve clinical performance at seven years: results from a multicenter prospective clinical trial.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The Mosaic valve is a third-generation stented porcine bioprosthesis built upon the historical durability of the Hancock II valve in an attempt to improve hemodynamic performance and durability. METHODS: This multicenter trial was prospective and non-randomized in design. Between February 1994 and October 1999, six centers following a common study protocol enrolled 797 patients (mean age 70 years: range: 21-88 years) who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR), and 232 patients (mean age 68 years; range: 17-84 years) who underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR). The cumulative follow up was 3,442 patient-years (pt-yr) for AVR (mean 4.3 years; maximum 8 years), and 870 pt-yr for MVR (mean 3.7 years; maximum 7 years). Follow up was complete for 95% of AVR patients, and for 97% of MVR patients. RESULTS: The mean gradient and calculated effective orifice area average across all valve sizes remained stable at one, four and six years. Freedom from valve-related adverse events (mean +/- SE) at one, four and seven years after AVR were, respectively: Antithromboembolic-related hemorrhage (ARH) 97.0 +/- 0.6, 95.6 +/- 0.9, and 94.6 +/- 5.1%; primary hemolysis 100, 100, and 100%; and structural valve deterioration (SVD) 100, 100 and 100%. Freedom at one, four and seven years after MVR were: ARH 96.9 +/- 1.2, 95.6 +/- 2.0, and 95.6 +/- 7.6%; primary hemolysis 100, 100, and 100%; and SVD 100, 100, and 100%. CONCLUSION: These mid-term results demonstrate the clinical safety and excellent performance of the Mosaic valve. Continued follow up will determine if this new-design, third-generation bioprosthesis will provide increased durability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".