MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2411144653

Стимулирование инновационной деятельности промышленного производства в условиях выхода российской экономики из кризиса

2011· article· ru· W2411144653 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Шанин Игорь Игоревич, Безрукова Татьяна Львовна, Борисов Алексей Николаевич

Bibliographic record

VenueЛесотехнический журнал · 2011
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEconomic and Technological Developments in Russia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecessionEconomic recoveryQuarter (Canadian coin)Financial crisisGlobal recessionInvestment (military)EconomicsEconomyEconomic policyBusinessGeographyMacroeconomicsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article considers the question of state support for innovation and supporting industries in exit time of Russian economy from the financial crisis. The state policy in economic recovery, aimed at supporting innovative activities of industrial enterprises is one of the components of the moments going out of the recession. Stimulation of innovations enterprise provides many benefits. The country's economy through the financial support by consistent steps goes to pre-crisis level. In 2010, economic recovery, that began in the second half of 2009, continued. After the end of recession, which lasted four quarters in a row in the second half of 2008 and the first half of 2009, when Russia's economy has declined by 11 %, economic growth continued through the next four quarters. By the second quarter of 2010 almost half of the recession was offset. GDP in the II quarter 2010 was by 5.2% above the level of the II quarter of 2009 the maximum point of the recession. Recovery growth occurred in the sectors most affected by the crisis in the manufacturing industry, focused on investment demand the machine-building industries. Drought and fires led to a pause in economic growth in the third quarter. In July, according to the Economic Development of Russia's GDP fell from seasonally adjusted 0.4 % and overall growth in January-July is estimated at 3.9 %. However, overall trend in the recovery in the coming months, is scheduled to resume. It will be supported by growth in consumer demand, recovery stocks, and expected by year-end increase in investment activity. This allows us to estimate the annual GDP growth of around 4 percent. At the same time, there remain risks associated with the reaction of the economy at large-scale losses in agriculture, continued stagnation in the construction and weak investment demand, which can limit the growth of 3.5-3.7 percent in 2010. The main factors of economic growth in the late last year were increase of exporters' revenues and the revival of consumer demand, supported by the improvement in the labor market. State policy has played a huge role in supporting the economy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueЛесотехнический журналSame topicEconomic and Technological Developments in RussiaFrench-language works237,207