Changes in serial magnetic resonance spectroscopy predict outcome in high-grade glioma during and after postoperative radiotherapy.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To determine any correlation between magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) pattern of high-grade glioma before, during, and after radiotherapy (RT) with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients prospectively underwent surgery and RT to 60 Gy. MRS was performed before RT, at week 4 of RT, and 2 months post-RT. Normalized and relative metabolite ratios were evaluated. Patients were grouped according to similar evolving MRS patterns and analyzed for differences in OS and PFS. RESULTS: Significant decreases in tumor choline/N-acetyl-aspartate and normalized choline were observed from baseline to post-RT. After a median follow-up of 22.9 months, patients with >40% decrease in normalized choline from week 4 during RT to 2 months post-RT had a significantly worse median OS (9.1 months vs. not reached, p<0.00001) and PFS (5.8 vs. 19.8 months, p=0.0018). CONCLUSION: The change in normalized choline at 2 months post-RT was highly prognostic for PFS and OS. This may allow more individualized response-based treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".