MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2411241462 · doi:10.1017/cem.2015.58

CAEP 2014 Academic symposium: “How to make research succeed in your department: How to fund your research program”

2015· article· en· W2411241462 on OpenAlexafffund
Christian Vaillancourt, Brian H. Rowe, J.D. Artz, Robert S. Green, Marcel Émond, Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Grant Innes, Jeffrey J. Perry, Lisa Calder, Ian G. Stiell

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Emergency Medicine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth and Medical Research Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of CalgaryCanadian Association of Emergency PhysiciansCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecOttawa HospitalDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchChina Academy of Engineering PhysicsGovernment of CanadaOttawa Hospital Research Institute
KeywordsSalaryWork (physics)Political sciencePlan (archaeology)Grant fundingPublic relationsBusinessMedicineMedical educationPublic administrationEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.172
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.316
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Incentives · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.909

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1720.316
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.006
Bibliometrics0.0070.004
Science and technology studies0.0220.012
Scholarly communication0.0270.020
Open science0.0090.028
Research integrity0.0640.064
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0660.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.695
GPT teacher head0.588
Teacher spread0.107 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainIncentives
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Emergency MedicineSame topicHealth and Medical Research ImpactsFrench-language works237,207