Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the last decade, blood bank specialists have shown an increased interest in molecular analyses to complement serology work in determining blood group antigens. To efficiently respond to the numerous demands made for hemolytic disease of the newborn cases and polytransfused patients, we designed an inexpensive colorimetric high-throughput method to genotype several blood group antigens rapidly. Three simple steps are required to perform this technique: genomic DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and amplicon detection by a microplate ELISA. The 96-well plate format facilitates the manipulations and enables the analysis of multiple samples at once or the analysis of multiple antigens for fewer samples.The most common and clinically relevant minor blood group antigens were adapted to this method and are described in this work: Rh (D, C, c, E, e), Kell (K, k), Duffy (Fy(a), Fy(b)), and Kidd (Jk(a), Jk(b)). Other blood group antigens could be easily tested this way as long as their molecular basis is well established.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".