MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2411600316 · doi:10.1503/cjs.006316

Amélioration continue de la qualité en chirurgie orthopédique: modifications et répercussions de la réforme du financement du système de santé

2016· editorial· fr· W2411600316 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Paul E. Beaulé, Darren M. Roffey, Stéphane Poitras

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Surgery · 2016
Typeeditorial
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsCanadian Physiotherapy AssociationOttawa Public HealthOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au Canada, les dépenses totales en santé prévues pour 2015 s’élevaient à 219,1 milliards de dollars, soit 6105 dollars par habitant[1][1]. Les soins orthopédiques comptaient pour environ 12 % des dépenses associées aux soins actifs dans les hôpitaux[2][2]. En 2012–2013, pour chaque

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.049
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Evaluation · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.049
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0140.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainEvaluation
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of SurgerySame topicClinical practice guidelines implementationFrench-language works237,207