MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2411644988

[Factors associated with mitral regurgitation in men with ischemic heart disease without myocardial infarction].

2013· article· en· W2411644988 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kuznetsov Va, Iaroslvaskaia Ei, Д. В. Криночкин, Г. С. Пушкарев, Mar'inskikh Lv

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionEjection fractionCoronary artery diseaseMitral regurgitationHeart failureOdds ratioStenosisAnginaConfidence intervalCanadian Cardiovascular Society
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: Being independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality, mitral regurgitation (MR) has a negative influence on prognosis of ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients. Data on MR pathogenesis in IHD patients without myocardial infarction (MI) are insufficient. PURPOSE: To reveal factors associated with MR in CAD men without myocardial infarction. METHODS: Out of 16839 patients of the "Register of performed coronary angiography" we selected men with significant coronary stenosis (> or = 75% of lumen of at least one epicardial artery) who had no acute or previous MI: 1001 patients without MR and 66 patients with moderate and severe MR. RESULTS: Men with MR were older (59.0 +/- 7.3 vs 52.8 +/- 7.4 year), more often had NYHA class III--IV heart failure (27.4 vs. 10.9%), arrhythmias (61.0 vs. 14.8%) (all p < 0.001), but rate of angina of Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class III--IV was lower among patients with MR (46.7 vs. 63.2%, p = 0.019). Echocardiographic index of left atrial dimension was higher in men with MR (23.5 +/- 2.9 vs. 20.3 +/- 2.1 mm/m2, p < 0.001) as well as all indices of linear echocardiographic dimensions of cardiac chambers; left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction was lower (51.0 +/- 10.7 vs 61.0 +/- 4.9%, p < 0.001) in this group. There were no differences in coronary angiographic data between groups. According to the mulrivariate analysis, MR was independently associated with arrhythmias (odds ratio [OR] 7.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.21-19.57; p < 0.001), index of left atrial dimension (OR = 1.25; 95% CI 1.09-1.43; p = 0.002), LV ejection fraction (OR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.75-0.89; p < 0.001), CCS angina class (OR = 0.49; 95%CI 0.24-0.98; p = 0.044) and age (OR = 1.09; 95%CI 1.03-1.16; p = 0.005). MR in CAD men without MI was associated with arrhythmias, higher index of left atrium dimension, lower LV ejection fraction, worse CCS angina class and older age. No association between MR and localization of significant coronary lesions was found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→