MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Letter regarding “Histopathology of Psoriasis Treated With Zinc Pyrithione”

2001· letter· en· W2411825127 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adolfo Aliaga

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Dermatopathology · 2001
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDermatopathologyHistopathologyZincDermatologyPsoriasisProduct (mathematics)MedicinePathologyChemistryMathematicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: It was with great interest that I read the article by Caroline G. Rowlands, M.B.B.S., F.R.C.P.C., about the “Histopathology of Psoriasis Treated With Zinc Pyrithione,” published in The American Journal of Dermatopathology(1). I am of the opinion that the paper is correct, and that the histopathologic findings after Skin Cap application (presumably a zinc pyrithione formulation) reveal a rapid and unequivocal improvement of the lesions, with full resolution after 14 days of treatment. However, I wish to point out that the commercial Skin Cap product was initially denounced in Spain, where it was first commercialized, because of its important concentrations of highly potent corticoids, which caused the Spanish health authorities to remove the product from the market. Similar measures were subsequently adopted in the rest of the European Community where the drug was also commercialized. In the United States, the manufacturers of the drug have also been denounced, on the grounds that although they claim the product to be inoffensive—supposedly containing only zinc pyrithione—the formulation in fact also contains 1.0% triamcinolone or 0.05% clobetasol propionate. The manufacturers falsely claim that the presence of such corticoids is the result of contamination during the production process. In view of these developments, I feel that two aspects should be taken into consideration. First, the author should determine whether the product used contained corticoids, because all the changes described in the review could be accounted for by the presence of a potent corticoid. Second, I would suggest that the study should be repeated with a certified zinc pyrithione solution at the same concentration as that supposedly found in the commercial Skin Cap product (which on the other hand is sure to be adulterated). I sincerely believe that the author would find my suspicions to be well founded. My hope in writing this letter is to prevent the manufacturers of this fraudulent product, which according to all indications can cause side effects, from using your article to favor sales in other countries such as Canada. Adolfo Aliaga, M.D.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of DermatopathologySame topicPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisFrench-language works237,207