The utility of Valsalva maneuver in the diagnoses of orthostatic disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess hemodynamic responses and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) indexes during Valsalva maneuver (VM) and head-up tilt (HUT) testing in orthostatic intolerance (OI). Patients with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (NOH, n = 26), postural tachycardia syndrome (n = 26) and symptomatic OI (n = 14) were compared with healthy population (control, n = 107) and inappropriate sinus tachycardia (n = 7). Hemodynamic assessment included patterning and quantification with vagal and adrenergic BRS (BRSa/BRSa1). In NOH, cardiovagal systolic blood pressure (SBP) decrements in VM and HUT were correlated (r = 0.660, P < 0.001); a "V" pattern of VM indicated α-BRSa failure. Yet BRSa1 did not reveal changes vs. control (P > 0.05) or was not applicable in 60% of NOH. In symptomatic OI, compared with control, cardiovagal SBP decrements were larger (P < 0.05); higher BRSa1 contradicted higher adrenergic index (Composite Autonomic Severity Score). Overshoot in phase IV dipped below baseline or dropped ≥ 10 mmHg over 8 s in postural tachycardia syndrome ("N" pattern), but by 3 s in inappropriate sinus tachycardia ("M" pattern). Visualization of distinct VM patterns allows primary evaluation of autonomic dysfunction and differentiation of the various forms of OI. BRSa1 evaluation is compromised by pathological SBP patterns. VM patterning is a valuable nonpostural supplement to HUT capable of detecting and differentiating OI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".