Assessment of outcomes in surgically staged I/II endometrial adenocarcinoma patients treated with postoperative vaginal vault radiotherapy only.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of vaginal vault radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment for patients with high-grade, stage I/II endometrial adenocarcinoma who have been surgically staged. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 77 women between 1995 and 2006 with high-grade surgically staged I and II endometrial adenocarcinoma, who were treated with postoperative vaginal vault radiotherapy alone, was performed. The primary study end points were recurrence risk and sites of recurrence. The secondary end points were disease-free and overall survival. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for overall and disease-free survival. RESULTS: Seventy-seven women were identified and met inclusion criteria. Sixty-seven (87%) had grade 3 histologic features on final pathologic report. Forty-two patients (55%) were classified as stage IB, having superficial myometrial invasion; 21 (27%) were stage IC, with deep invasion; and 6 (8%) were stage II, involving the cervix. The median follow-up was 80 months (6.6 years). There were 10 recurrences (13.0%), of which 3 were local: 1 involving the vaginal apex; 1, the lower vagina and pelvic sidewall; and 1, the lower vagina. The 5-year recurrence risk was 11.2% and the 5-year survival probability 88.9%. CONCLUSIONS: It seems that for this cohort of 77 patients with surgically staged I and II grade 3 endometrial adenocarcinoma, adjuvant vaginal vault radiotherapy alone leads to acceptable recurrence rates and survival while minimizing morbidity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".