MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2412047521 · doi:10.14393/bj-v32n3a2016-32289

Development and formulation of azospirillum lipoferum and pseudomonas fluorescens as effective biological agents for enhanced agro-productivity

2016· article· en· W2412047521 on OpenAlexaff
S Tamilselvi, Asmita Dutta, M Sindhu, G. Murugesan, Balakrishnaraja Rengaraju

Bibliographic record

VenueBioscience Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant tissue culture and regeneration
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPseudomonas fluorescensBiofertilizerMicrobial inoculantPseudomonasBeneficial organismPopulationFood scienceChemistryMicroorganismHorticultureIncubationBiologyBacteriaInoculationBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biofertilizer is a group of beneficial microorganisms used for improving the productivity of soil by fixing atmospheric nitrogen or by solubilizing soil phosphorus. They also stimulate plant growth through synthesis of growth promoting substances. In this present study, Azospirillum lipoferum is grown in Nitrogen free Bromothymol blue (Nfb) medium and Pseudomonas fluorescens in King's B medium. Bioprocess condition was optimized for both of the culture and found that Pseudomonas fluorescens has shown highest growth at 300C in pH 8 after 72 hours of incubation where as Azospirillum lipoferum showed highest cell concentration at 310C in pH 7, with incubation period of 72 hours. The optimized culture is mixed with different formulations of powder and liquid carrier such as Saw dust, Rice husk, Date seed powder, Matka khad, Jiwamrit and Beejamrit respectively. Shelf life study for 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 days by cell counting and spread plate method showed that shelf life of the biofertilizer produced from Powder and liquid carriers had high amount of viable microbial population up to 120 days storage. Among biofertilizer based bio inoculants, Saw dust showed maximum population of 77x109cfu/ml for Azospirillum lipoferum and 72 x 109 CFU/ml for Pseudomonas strain on 120th day and the liquid carrier Matka khad showed 85x109 cfu/ml for Azospirillum lipoferum and 78 x 109 CFU/ml for Pseudomonas fluorescens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.166

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioscience JournalSame topicPlant tissue culture and regenerationFrench-language works237,207