Factors Associated with Decompression and Strabismus Surgery in Thyroid Eye Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Prognostication of the thyroid patient with eye disease aids in the choice of treatment strategy. To facilitate this, we investigated factors associated with decompression and/ or strabismus surgery in the Singaporean population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 5-year retrospective study was performed. Patients who required strabismus and/or decompression surgery (n = 23) were compared to those who did not undergo either surgery (n = 44). Individual and multivariate age-adjusted odds ratios were calculated to determine significant associations. RESULTS: Individually, male gender [odds ratio (OR), 4.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.5 to 13.4], uncontrolled hyperthyroidism (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.1 to 14.3), steroid therapy (OR, 7.4; 95% CI, 2.3 to 24), diplopia (OR, 7.3; 95% CI, 2.3 to 23.1), objective vertical myopathy (OR, 11.7; 95% CI, 1.4 to 96.0), elevated intraocular pressure in the primary position (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 10.0) and clinical evidence of optic neuropathy (OR, 13.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 124.6) were significantly associated with the need for surgery. Logistic regression analysis showed the greater impact of male gender (OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.2 to 15.4), optic neuropathy (OR, 13.0; 95% CI, 1.2 to 143.7) and previous steroid therapy (OR, 4.2; 95%CI, 1.1 to 16.2) on prognostication. CONCLUSIONS: Chances of requiring strabismus and/or decompression surgery are significantly higher for male patients and those with uncontrolled hyperthyroidism. In particular, male patients with optic neuropathy and a history of previous steroid therapy warrant a graver prognosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".