Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider Hilbert series of ordinary Lie algebras, restricted (or p-) Lie algebras, \nand color Lie (p-)superalgebras. We derive a dimension formula similar to a wellknown \nWitt’s formula for free color Lie superalgebras and a certain class of color Lie \np-superalgebras. A Lie (super)algebra analogue of a well-known Schreier’s formula \nfor the rank of a subgroup of finite index in a free group was found by V. M. Petrogradsky. \nIn this dissertation, Petrogradsky’s formulas are extended to the case of \ncolor Lie (p-)superalgebras. We establish more Schreier-type formulas for the ranks \nof submodules of free modules over free associative algebras and free group algebras. \nAs an application, we consider Hopf subalgebras of some cocommutative Hopf algebras. \nAlso, we apply our version of Witt and Schreier formulas to study relatively \nfree color Lie (p-)superalgebras and to prove that the free color Lie superalgebra and \nits enveloping algebra have the same entropy. Y. A. Bahturin and A. Y. Olshanskii \nproved that the relative growth rate of a finitely generated subalgebra K of a free Lie \nalgebra L of finite rank is strictly less than the growth rate of the free Lie algebra \nitself. We show that this theorem cannot be extended to free color Lie superalgebras \nin general. However, we establish it in a special case.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".