MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MG-127 Diagnostic accuracy of chromosome microarray in children with epilepsy and neurological abnormalities of unknown aetiology

2015· article· en· W2412342400 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sarah E. Buerki, Erin Slade, Kamilla Schlade‐Bartusiak, Lindsay Brown, Evica Rajcan‐Separovic, Patrice Eydoux, Mary Connolly, Michelle Demos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British ColumbiaBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpilepsyEtiologyMicroarrayChromosomeMedicineMicroarray analysis techniquesBioinformaticsGeneticsPediatricsBiologyPathologyNeuroscienceGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Chromosome MicroArray-based genomic copy-number analysis (CMA) has an important role in the discovery of both novel and recurrent epilepsy-associated copy number variants (CNVs) in patients with epilepsy. In case of an additional neuro-developmental disorder the diagnostic accuracy may be as high as 15%. <h3>Objectives</h3> The purpose of this study is to describe the results of performed CMA on 706 children with unexplained epilepsy associated with developmental delay/intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders and/or multiple congenital anomalies (‘epilepsy plus’). <h3>Design/method</h3> Retrospective chart review on clinical and genetic aspects of CNVs identified in 706 patients with ‘epilepsy plus’, seen at the Vancouver BC Children’s Hospital from 2009 to 2014. All patients had CMA performed using Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0 or CytoScanHD®. <h3>Results</h3> Abnormal CMA results were identified in 191 out of 706 children with ‘epilepsy plus’. 122/706 (17.3%) patients had variants of unknown significance (VUS), and 80/706 (11.3%) patients had pathogenic CNVs. This group included 19 patients that had CNVs in genomic “hotspots” predisposing to epilepsy, including 1q21.1 (n = 1), 15q11.2 (n = 2), 15q13.3 (n = 4), 15q11-q13 (n = 3), 16p11.2 (n = 1046), and 16p13.11 (n = 3). Among other known microdeletion/microduplication syndromes (n = 20) was 22q13.3 deletion (Phelan-McDermid Syndrome) (n = 4). One of the four 22q13.3 deletion patients had treatment resistant epilepsy and a small deletion (47kb) of the SHANK3 gene. <h3>Conclusions</h3> CMA revealed pathogenic CNVs in epilepsy “hotspots”, and known microdeletion syndromes like Phelan-McDermid syndrome in 11.3% of children with ‘epilepsy plus’. Examination of CNVs also plays an important role in the identification of possible epilepsy genes i.g. SHANK3 mutations in patients with 22q13.3 deletions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207