MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2412457264

The incidence and prognosis of Brugada electrocardiographic pattern in the Manitoba Follow-Up Study.

2005· article· en· W2412457264 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsSt. Boniface Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBrugada syndromeHumanitiesGynecologyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of long-term follow-up data on individuals with asymptomatic Brugada electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence and prognosis of spontaneous Brugada ECG pattern in a prospective cohort. METHODS: The Manitoba Follow-up Study is Canada's longest-running study of cardiovascular disease. Since 1948, a cohort of 3983 healthy aircrew recruits has been followed with routine medical examination, including ECG. Over a 55-year follow-up period, clinical and ECG assessments were performed every three to five years, with yearly contact to monitor vital status. The mean age of the cohort at entry and the average age of the 1375 survivors in 2003 were 31 and 83 years of age, respectively. Brugada ECG pattern was defined as ST-segment elevation in at least one of leads V1 to V3 with a J wave amplitude of at least 2 mm, negative T waves, generally coved ST-T configuration, in the absence of alternative explanations. Serial ECGs of 273 subjects (6.9% of the cohort) with complete right bundle branch block at any time during follow-up were reviewed. Follow-up records pertaining to clinical course were also reviewed. RESULTS: All ECGs (in total 5665) from this cohort were reviewed. Four men had intermittent Brugada ECG pattern (lifetime incidence one per 1000): three men (all 80 years of age or older) were well on last follow-up and one had died of Alzheimer's disease. None of these men had syncope or ventricular arrhythmias documented during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The longevity of asymptomatic individuals in this cohort was not affected by spontaneous Brugada ECG pattern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it