The incidence and prognosis of Brugada electrocardiographic pattern in the Manitoba Follow-Up Study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of long-term follow-up data on individuals with asymptomatic Brugada electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence and prognosis of spontaneous Brugada ECG pattern in a prospective cohort. METHODS: The Manitoba Follow-up Study is Canada's longest-running study of cardiovascular disease. Since 1948, a cohort of 3983 healthy aircrew recruits has been followed with routine medical examination, including ECG. Over a 55-year follow-up period, clinical and ECG assessments were performed every three to five years, with yearly contact to monitor vital status. The mean age of the cohort at entry and the average age of the 1375 survivors in 2003 were 31 and 83 years of age, respectively. Brugada ECG pattern was defined as ST-segment elevation in at least one of leads V1 to V3 with a J wave amplitude of at least 2 mm, negative T waves, generally coved ST-T configuration, in the absence of alternative explanations. Serial ECGs of 273 subjects (6.9% of the cohort) with complete right bundle branch block at any time during follow-up were reviewed. Follow-up records pertaining to clinical course were also reviewed. RESULTS: All ECGs (in total 5665) from this cohort were reviewed. Four men had intermittent Brugada ECG pattern (lifetime incidence one per 1000): three men (all 80 years of age or older) were well on last follow-up and one had died of Alzheimer's disease. None of these men had syncope or ventricular arrhythmias documented during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The longevity of asymptomatic individuals in this cohort was not affected by spontaneous Brugada ECG pattern.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".