Gone in 24 hours: the feasibility of performing pubovaginal sling surgery with an overnight hospital stay.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Numerous management strategies are available for stress urinary incontinence, a significant problem for many women. The pubovaginal sling (PVS) with rectus fascia has proven efficacy with minimal morbidity. Historically, patients were admitted for an average of 4 days at the Ottawa Hospital. Since November 2001, patients have spent one night in hospital thereby cutting their total length of stay to less than 24 hours. This study assesses the feasibility of this approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethics approval was obtained. All patient charts were reviewed retrospectively. Exclusion criteria included women booked for combined procedures or patient refusal. Each case was reviewed to determine if admission to hospital following surgery was required or if subsequent visits to emergency occurred. The Financial Department of the Ottawa Hospital provided financial information to estimate cost savings. Each patient was contacted and administered a standard satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: The length of stay was less than 24 hours in all but one case. One patient required a 48-hour stay secondary to post operative nausea. No patient returned to the ER for assessment following discharge. The estimated cost savings were $2709 per case. Patients tolerated having this procedure performed on a daycare basis. CONCLUSIONS: PVS may be performed safely as short stay surgery with a high degree of patient satisfaction. This results in increased efficiency and improved utilization of increasingly limited healthcare resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".