MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2412641054 · doi:10.22230/cjc.2016v41n2a3040

Teaching Communication Activism: Communication Education for Social Justice

2016· article· en· W2412641054 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Monica Anne Batac

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Communication · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRhetoric and Communication Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial justiceSociologyEconomic JusticeSocial activismSocial communicationPedagogySocial psychologyPolitical sciencePsychologyCriminologyCommunicationLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Teaching Communication Activism: Communication Education for Social Justice, Frey, Palmer, and the volume's contributing authors work together to introduce and illustrate communication activism pedagogy (CAP) in theory and application.CAP, as Frey and Palmer (2014) describe, "teaches students studying communication how to use their communication knowledge and capabilities to promote social justice" and this volume provides "exemplars of how communication educators have accomplished that goal in practice" (p.2).Organized around four categories, the chapters cover theoretical explorations of CAP, CAP courses, social justice activism service-learning, and CAP as extended to other populations and sites beyond the traditional college classroom.The book begins with a foreword by Peter McLaren, one of the leading scholars in critical pedagogy and, more broadly, social justice education (e.g., see McLaren, 1998; McLaren & Kincheloe, 2007).McLaren ends his foreword by noting that CAP illustrates how critical pedagogy involves all disciplines.Indeed, this co-edited text demonstrates critical pedagogy in communication teaching and learning, but it also pushes critical pedagogy in an important way.CAP urges educators to move beyond raising students' awareness about injustice and toward teaching them how to intervene and take action.The first three chapters weave the underpinnings of CAP and support a critical reading of the text's subsequent articles.Providing historical, theoretical, philosophical, and ethical considerations, these chapters frame CAP as a pedagogical commitment to cultivating students' communication skills through facilitated learning that explores, questions, and intervenes in local and global contexts to promote social justice.CAP disrupts dominant discourses and common practices in communication education that prepare students to be market ready for the corporate world by teaching students to use communication theories, methods, and practices to intervene in unjust situations and work toward social change.Frey and Palmer's contributors discuss issues such as gender and violence (Chapter 6), activist performance (Chapters 7, 14, 15), and environmental advocacy (Chapter 8).To tackle these and other important issues, the authors work with diverse communities, ranging from migrant workers (Chapter 10), to middle and high school students (Chapters 11, 13), prisoners (Chapter 14), and indigenous communities in Guatemala (Chapter 15).These descriptions are not exhaustive.All authors employ simple yet powerful prose.Many chapters include quotations from students and community partners to illustrate each teaching example.The chapters on CAP courses provide sample syllabi, including reading lists and evaluation procedures.Each contributor provides insight on course design and inspiration, and openly discusses challenges and ways to improve such teaching.The work is accessible not only in terms of its con-Reviews • Canadian Journal of Communication, Vol 41 (2)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of CommunicationSame topicRhetoric and Communication StudiesFrench-language works237,207