MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2412648904 · doi:10.1057/9781403919588_2

Kaspar Hauser Appears in Nuremberg

2001· book-chapter· en· W2412648904 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2001
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean history and politics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanDramaWifeLawArtHistoryClassicsArt historyPolitical scienceLiteratureArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The city in which the drama of Kaspar Hauser unfolded had a rich and proud history. In 1471 the astronomer Johannes Müller (Regiomontanus) flattered the city fathers by proclaiming the city to be the centre of Europe.1 As a sign of its wealth and sense of civic responsibility Nuremberg was one of the first cities in Europe to boast a public library which was opened in the early sixteenth century. Henry IV of France’s brilliant financial councillor Maximilien de Béthune, Duc de Sully, while in retirement after the assassination of his royal master dreamt up a fantastic scheme for the peace of Europe. Fifteen regions were to be created with six regional councils. Nuremberg was to be the seat of the German body.2 By 1828 such schemes would have seemed even more preposterous and the city had yet to adjust fully to its new and inferior position within the German Confederation. On 15 September 1806 at ten in the morning the French plenipotentiary Friron handed over the imperial city of Nuremberg to the Bavarian commissioner Count Thürnheim in an impressive ceremony. Cannons roared, church bells rang, French soldiers and the Nuremberg militia paraded through the streets as the decision of the Act of Confederation of the Rhine was formally acknowledged. The patricians of the city were appalled. The wife of the prominent businessman Paul Wolfgang Merkel burst into tears and told her bemused children that they were now the slaves of princes.3

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooksSame topicEuropean history and politicsFrench-language works237,207