[Associations of Crohn's disease with DR4 and DR5 gene polymorphisms].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the associations of death receptor DR4 and DR5 gene polymorphisms with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: A total of 295 CD patients and 490 healthy controls were recruited. Three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the DR4 (rs13278062, rs20575) and DR5 (rs1047266) genes were determined with a SNaPshot method. Unconditional logistic regression analysis was carried out for determining the allelic and genotypic differences of the three SNPs between CD patients and the controls, as well as the influence of the DR4 and DR5 gene polymorphisms on the clinical features of CD patients. Linkage disequilibrium and haplotype analysis were calculated by haplotype 4.2 and R language software. A gene-gene interaction model was established to analyze whether the three SNPs can exert a synergistic effect on the susceptibility to CD. RESULTS: The mutant allele (T) and genotype (GT+TT) of DR4 (rs13278062) were increased among CD patients compared to the controls (37.12% vs. 32.04%, P = 0.040, 95%CI: 1.010-1.550; 62.71% vs. 54.90%, P = 0.032, 95%CI: 1.028-1.855, respectively). However, the allelic and genotypic frequencies of DR4 (rs20575) and DR5 (rs1047266) did not differ between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Based on the Montreal Classification Standards, the CD patients were stratified by locations and behaviors of the disease. After multiple comparison correction (P < 0.0125), compared to ileocolonic CD patients respectively, the mutant allele (T) and genotype (GT+TT) of the rs13278062 polymorphism were significantly increased in colonic CD patients (41.04% vs. 25.64%, P = 0.002, 95%CI: 0.315-0.778; 66.04% vs. 41.03%, P = 0.001, 95%CI: 0.196-0.655, respectively) and terminal ileum CD patients (41.44% vs. 25.64%, P = 0.002, 95%CI: 0.311-0.762; 74.77% vs. 41.03%, P < 0.001, 95%CI: 0.126-0.437, respectively). In comparison to penetrating CD patients, the mutant allele (T) and genotype (GT+TT) of DR4 (rs13278062) were significantly decreased in stricturing CD patients (32.29% vs. 48.91%, P = 0.007, 95%CI: 0.300-0.828; 57.29% vs. 86.96%, P = 0.001, 95%CI: 0.078-0.520, respectively). A similar conclusion was drawn for the mutant genotype (GT+TT) of DR4 (rs13278062) in non-stricturing, non-penetrating CD patients (58.82% vs. 86.96%, P = 0.001, 95%CI: 0.086-0.536). Haplotype analysis indicated that the CT haplotype formed by rs20575 and rs13278062 was increased in CD patients compared to the controls (37.1% vs. 31.8%, P = 0.029, OR=1.279, 95%CI: 1.022-1.600). The outcome of a gene-gene interaction model indicated that the mutant genotype (GT+TT) of DR4 (rs13278062) and mutant genotype (CT+TT) of DR5 (rs1047266) may play a negatively synergistic role in CD patients (B = - 0.483, OR = 0.617, P = 0.030). CONCLUSION: The rs13278062 polymorphism of the DR4 gene not only can confer an increased risk for CD, but may also influence the location of the lesions and the disease behaviors. The CT haplotype formed by rs20575 and rs13278062 may be an independent risk factor for CD. Furthermore, the mutant genotype (GT+TT) of DR4 (rs13278062) and mutant genotype (CT+TT) of DR5 (rs1047266) may exert a negative synergistic effect on CD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".