Review of upcoming motor and drive systems efficiency regulations in U.S. and Europe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued new efficiency regulations in May of 2014 [1] for integral horsepower motors effective June 2016. This paper will provide an update on these new regulations for one (1) through 500 horsepower (HP) low voltage AC induction motors. The scope of coverage has been expanded to cover more configurations than in previous regulations. 56 frame enclosed motors are covered. Motor regulations for Canada and Mexico generally follow what is adopted in the U.S. Europe is updating succeeding regulations for LV motors (<;1000 Volts) and drive systems with an “extended product approach” from 0.12 through 1000 kW by 2018. Additionally, the DOE is studying pump, fan and compressor systems and how the efficiency can be regulated. We will provide an overview of the DOE proposals and the new European standard for efficient drive systems in case any users wish to follow and become involved with comments. This paper will review the motor and system efficiency regulations for the U.S. which are being issued by the DOE and also discuss extended product regulations under development by the European Union (EU).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".