Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker inhibits pulmonary injury.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Pulmonary damage and fibrosis may be the result of diverse forms of injury and there is an association between pulmonary diseases and cardiovascular events. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, valsartan, on systemic, cellular, and fibrotic consequences of pulmonary injury induced by the anti-neoplastic antibiotic, bleomycin. METHODS: Sprague Dawly rats were used in the classical bleomycin model of pulmonary fibrosis. Bleomycin (1 unit, n = 7) was administered intra-tracheally to induce lung injury. Valsartan (0.66 mg) was given either concomitantly (n = 9) or for two days prior to bleomycin (n = 8). A control group (n = 6) was given normal saline. RESULTS: Valsartan-treated animals showed abrogation of weight loss, suppression of release of total and active transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-beta1), and diminished connective tissue synthesis. In an explant, lung tissue culture model devoid of alveolar macrophages (saline control, n = 3; bleomycin, n = 6; bleomycin plus valsartan, n = 12), both total and active TGF-beta1 were suppressed in the valsartan-treated cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Valsartan, known to have cardio-protective properties, was shown to be protective of bleomycin-induced pulmonary injury. Thus, ARBs may be beneficial in both cardiac and pulmonary diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".