MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2413256640

Wilms' tumor at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario: 1990-2001.

2004· article· en· W2413256640 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michael L. Pianezza, Steven E. Rubin, Juan Bass, Shirley Chou, John Pike, Michael P. Leonard

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWilms' tumorStage (stratigraphy)Clear-cell sarcomaAnaplasiaRetrospective cohort studyDiseaseInternal medicinePediatricsPathologySarcoma
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Wilms' Tumor is the most common malignant neoplasm of the urinary tract in children. Since 1969, the National Wilms' Tumor Study Group (NWTSG) has contributed to improving the clinical management and outcome of children affected by Wilms' Tumor. We have managed our patients according to NWTSG protocols and report our results herein. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of consecutive patients presenting at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) with a diagnosis of Wilms' Tumor between April 1990 and March 2001. RESULTS: Forty patients with Wilms' Tumor (18 M/22 F) were diagnosed at CHEO during this interval. Mean age at diagnosis was 28.5 months. The most common presenting feature was a palpable abdominal mass in 85%. An overgrowth syndrome was noted in 10%. Metastatic disease was present at diagnosis in 20%, with the lungs (75%) the most common site of involvement. Distribution of clinical stage: I = 40%, II = 20%, III = 20%, IV = 15%, V = 5%. Favorable histology (FH) was diagnosed in 82.5%, anaplasia in 12.5% and clear cell sarcoma (CCSK) in 5%. Nephrogenic rests were present in 43% (perilobar (PL) = 20%, intralobar (IL) = 18%, PL + IL = 5%). Recurrence of disease occurred in 10%, with lungs (100%) the most frequent site of relapse. Survival was significantly greater in stage I disease and in those patients with FH. Patient 4-year survival data: stage I (FH), 100%; stage II (FH), 80%; stage III (FH), 100%, stage IV (FH), 67%; stages I-IV (CCSK), 100%; stage V, 0%. Overall 4-year survival rates of patients with FH were 92% and of all patients in the study was 86%. CONCLUSIONS: The presentation of Wilms' Tumor at our institution mirrors that described in the literature. Importantly, by following NWTSG protocols we have achieved an outcome of overall 4-year patient survival comparable to the "gold standard". This demonstrates the utility of the NWTSG protocols as regards patient management of this relatively uncommon disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207