International Research on Parenting and Parent Education: Collaborative Conference and Beyond
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Globally, parents in families are coping with major societal changes. Economic distress, shifting resource allocation, and other societal pressures challenge today’s parents. Consequently, scholars in growing numbers focus on issues related to parenting and parent education. The papers in this special issue represent a very small but geographically diverse sample of the research of current global research on parenting. Global issues related to public policy and practices in a changing world are examined. Specific topics include contemporary international issues of maternal and paternal leave, cross-cultural influences, parenting policies, fertility, and relationships between deviance and parenting. Earlier versions of the papers were presented by scholars at the 2009 International Conference on Parent Education and Parenting. The conference was the first joint meeting of the University of North Texas’ Center for Parent Education (CPE) and the International Sociological Association’s Committee on Family Research (CFR). Because of the success of this initial conference the collaboration has continued and the third annual international conference is being planned in 2011. Detailed information about the CPE, the 2009 conference, other international research, practice presentations, and directions for future research are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.046 | 0.045 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.024 | 0.027 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.027 |
| Research integrity | 0.014 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".