Medical services in Vancouver, 1886-1920 : a study in the interplay of attitudes, medical knowledge, and administrative structures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The establishment of the City of Vancouver coincided with the development of new types of medical treatment made possible by bacteriologically-based scientific medicine. This thesis describes the development of medical services in Vancouver from 1886, the date of its incorporation, to 1920 and thereby exposes the process in which applications of scientific discovery were incorporated into ordinary life. It comprises an examination of the environment in which Vancouver's medical services grew, of the nature and development of some specific medical services, and of the interaction of services during the 1918-1919 influenza epidemic. The specific services studied are: medical attendance, the city's principal hospital, nursing services provided by a voluntary association, and the public school hygiene program of the period. As medical science and its parallel technology grew in scope and complexity, medical services proliferated and became increasingly specialized, institutionalized, and subject to the direction of medical experts; laymen lost control over the development of medical services and the treatment of their own bodies. Although revolutionary in effect, those changes occurred easily in the period's growing climate of faith in medicine and the commitment of its purveyors to healing. That faith was encouraged by medical personnel, in Vancouver building upon a favourable disposition toward health projects established in the city's early days by speculators who had envisoned the city which was to make their fortunes peopled with a healthy citizenry. Popular acceptance of the new structure of medical services is evidenced by increased demand for medical care and by a growth of mechanisms for spreading its cost widely enough to support an increased supply. The resulting availability of medical service contributed to the relatively good state of health which prevailed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".