La índole de un instituto de vida consagrada como núcleo de su carisma. Comentario al can. 578 del Código de Derecho Canónico
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, the author systematically addresses the topic of charism, seeking to present the conceptual content of an institute of consecrated life’s patrimony according to canon 578 of the Code of Canon Law. In particular, he presents the character of the institute as the basis of the charism, that is, as the nucleus or essence which best reflects the charism in the life of the institute. The character, in this sense, is considered as the unity that comes from the combination of proper and particular elements that the charism imprints on the new community and which give it an individual identity that differentiates it from other similar communities of the same species in the Church. The character also involves a particular style of sanctification and apostolate that establishes a tradition specific to the institute, in such a way that its objective elements are sufficiently identifiable. From this perspective, healthy traditions come from the character of the institute; they show how the charism is “incarnated” in its members in a way that corresponds to their vocation. This is why the Church defends and sustains the proper character of institutes and proposes it as a criterion for renewal (cfr. LG, 44; MR, 11). The character, thus understood, will be the element of the patrimony which most reflects the charism, as well as being the factor that will determine the nature, purpose and spirit of each institute.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".