MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2413758964 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov236.10

TMIC-10PLEIOTROPY OF TUMOR-ASSOCIATED MYELOID CELLS WITHIN HUMAN GLIOBLASTOMA

2015· article· en· W2413758964 on OpenAlexaff
Konrad Gabrusiewicz, Jun Wei, Yuuri Hashimoto, Benjamin A.T. Rodriguez, Maiti Sourindra, Brandon Liebelt, Luke M. Healy, Roeland Verhaak, Raversanker Ezhilarasan, Shouhao Zhou, Neal Huang, Jefffrey Weinberg, Sujit S. Prabhu, Ganesh Rao, Raymond Sawaya, Frederick F. Lang, Erik P. Sulman, Laurence J.N. Cooper, Jack P. Antel, Amy B. Heimberger

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlioblastomaTumor cellsMyeloid cellsMyeloidMyeloid leukemiaCancer researchMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: GBM is highly infiltrated by diverse immune cells including microglia, monocyte-derived macrophages, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Understanding the mechanisms through which glioblastoma-associated myeloid cells (GAMs) undergo a metamorphosis into tumor supportive cells, characterizing the heterogeneity of immune cell phenotypes within GBM subtypes and discovering new targets can help to design new efficient immunotherapies against GBM. METHODS: GAMs were isolated from GBMs by immunomagnetic separation (n = 17) and microglia were identified as CD11b+CD45low, MDSCs as CD11b+CD33+CD45med, and macrophages as CD11b+CD45high. Whole genome microarray analysis (30,275 human genes) was performed using RNA isolated from the GAMs and matched blood monocytes. Comparisons were also made between GAMs and healthy donor monocytes (n = 11), normal adult human brain microglia (n = 9), and normal human CD14+ monocytes polarized into the M0, M1, M2a, and M2c phenotype (n = 5) using flow cytometry, and gene/microRNA expression profiling. RESULTS: GBM patients had elevated monocytes relative to normal donors. Among CD11b+ cells, microglia and MDSCs constituted a higher percentage of GBM-infiltrating immune cells compared to macrophages. GAM profiling revealed a continuum between anti-tumor pro-inflammatory M1- (MHC II, CD80, CD86, p-STAT1, TNF-α) and tumor-supportive M2-like (CD163, CD206, p-STAT3, TGF-β1, IL-10) myeloid cells, with immune functional assays indicating greater alignment with M2. Flow cytometry studies and gene expression analysis demonstrated, that M1-and M2-polarized macrophages expressed a unique mixed M1/M2 phenotype. GAMs and GBM patient blood monocytes showed distinct immunological functions with the former aligned closer to an M2 phenotype that seemed to play a crucial role in GBM invasiveness and progression. CONCLUSIONS: Within GBM, microglia and MDSCs constitute the majority of tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells that express genes within the continuum of M1/M2 with alignment favoring M2 indicating GAMs have pleiotropic immunological functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207