Tracking of familial resemblance for resting blood pressure over time in the Québec Family Study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The etiology of familial resemblance for systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure, both within a single time point as well as across time points, was assessed to determine how familial etiologies underlying a trait may change across time. SBP and DBP measurements were taken roughly 12 years apart in family members participating in the longitudinal Québec Family Study. A longitudinal (bivariate) familial correlation model yields 3 types of correlations: intraindividual cross-time (e.g., father's BP at time 1 with his own BP at time 2); interindividual within-time (e.g., father time 1 with child time 1); and interindividual cross-time (e.g., father time 1 with child time 2). In addition, the change in BP across time (i.e., time 1-time 2) is examined using a univariate family correlation model. This combined method is useful in assessing the degree to which the same familial factors are operating across time (interindividual cross-time correlations), as well as the degree to which different heritable components are involved across time (change score). Maximal heritabilities for SBP were about 70% at each time point, while for DBP the heritability was larger at time 1 (87%) than time 2 (39%). Both the change scores (48% for SBP and 54% for DBP) and the cross-time comparisons (58% to 72% for SBP and 63% to 65% for DBP) evidenced significant familial resemblance. These results illustrate how simple methodologies can be used to specify how familial etiologies underlying a trait may change across time. For BP, the model includes unique familial factors that are specific to each time measurement, and an additional familial factor which is common to both time points. The factors leading to differences in longitudinal familial resemblance for BP (i.e., the unique factors) may be primarily genetic in origin, while those leading to stability across time may include both genetic and familial environmental effects. Sex and/or age interactions with the genotypes are also suggested.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".