MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2413881455 · doi:10.1097/jnn.0000000000000160

Picturing the Experience of Living With Myotonic Dystrophy (DM1)

2015· article· en· W2413881455 on OpenAlex
Kori A. LaDonna, Shannon L. Venance

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience Nursing · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyotonic dystrophyPhotovoiceQualitative researchApathyMedicinePsychologyCoping (psychology)Clinical psychologyFocus groupDevelopmental psychologyCognitionPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Myotonic dystrophy presents with multisystemic complications, and there is a well-recognized myotonic dystrophy personality profile that is characterized by executive dysfunction, an avoidant personality, and impaired cognition. Understanding symptom impact on patients' lives is crucial for providing appropriate patient-centered care; however, much of the myotonic dystrophy literature reflects the biomedical model, and there is a paucity of articles exploring patient experience. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to use a novel research approach to explore the experiences of patients with myotonic dystrophy. METHODS: Nine individuals participated in a qualitative study using the photovoice method. Photovoice uses the visual image to document participants' lives, and participants took pictures pertaining to living with myotonic dystrophy that stimulated individual and focus group interviews. We used content analysis to analyze the data; in turn, codes were collapsed into themes and categories. Findings were presented to participants to ensure resonance. RESULTS: Participants took 0-40 photographs that depicted barriers and facilitators to living successfully with myotonic dystrophy. We identified two categories that include participants' challenges with everyday activities, their worries about the future, their grief for lost function and social opportunities, and their resilience and coping strategies. Participants also described their experiences using the photovoice method. CONCLUSION: Photovoice is a useful approach for conducting research in myotonic dystrophy. Participants were active research collaborators despite perceptions that individuals affected with myotonic dystrophy are apathetic. Our findings suggest that participants are concerned about symptom impact on reduced quality of life, not symptoms that clinicians preferentially monitor. Nurses, therefore, are essential for providing patient-centered, holistic care for patients' complex biopsychosocial needs. Research exploring current physician-led clinical care models is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it