MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2414071939 · doi:10.1002/cpp.2024

The Inference‐Based Approach (IBA) to the Treatment of Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder: An Open Trial Across Symptom Subtypes and Treatment‐Resistant Cases

2016· article· en· W2414071939 on OpenAlexafffund
Frederick Aardema, Kieron O’Connor, Marie‐Eve Delorme, Jean‐Sébastien Audet

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFonds de recherche du Québec
KeywordsPsychologyObsessive compulsiveClinical psychologyTreatment and control groupsMoodPsychiatryRandomized controlled trialConfusionMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current open trial evaluated an inference-based approach (IBA) to the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) across symptom subtypes and treatment-resistant cases. Following formal diagnosis through semi-structured interview by an independent evaluator, a total of 125 OCD participants across five major symptom subtypes entered a program of 24 sessions of treatment based on the IBA. An additional group of 22 participants acted as a natural wait-list control group. Participants were administered the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale before and after treatment as the principal outcome measure, as well as measures of negative mood states, inferential confusion and obsessive beliefs. Level of overvalued ideation was assessed clinically at pre-treatment using the Overvalued Ideation Scale. After 24 weeks of treatment, 102 treatment completers across all major subtypes of OCD showed significant reductions on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale with effect sizes ranging from 1.49 to 2.53 with a clinically significant improvement in 59.8% of participants. No improvement was observed in a natural wait-list comparison group. In addition, IBA was effective for those with high levels of overvalued ideation. Change in inferential confusion and beliefs about threat and responsibility were uniquely associated with treatment outcome. The study is the first large-scale open trial showing IBA to be effective across symptom subtypes and treatment-resistant cases. The treatment may be particularly valuable for those who have previously shown an attenuated response to other treatments. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. KEY PRACTITIONER MESSAGE: Psychological treatment based on the inference-based approach is an effective treatment for all major subtypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder. The treatment is equally effective for those with high and low levels of overvalued ideation. Treatment based on the inference-based approach may be particularly valuable for those who have shown an attenuated response to cognitive-behaviour therapy as usual.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.497
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Psychology & PsychotherapySame topicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersFrench-language works237,207