Systematic evaluation of the adsorption of organic vapors onto a miniaturized cartridge device using breakthrough tests in parallel experiment with a full size respirator cartridge
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Breakthrough experiments are essential for the characterization of the adsorption capacity and micropore volume of activated carbon respiratory cartridges and for the validation and determination of cartridge service life models. In an effort to gain better control over environmental conditions in breakthrough tests and to obtain reliable data, a novel experimental approach using a miniaturized (Mini) cartridge was designed to replicate a small section of a respiratory cartridge. The Mini device and the organic vapor respiratory cartridge were tested in single and parallel experiments where in the former, one filter was tested one at a time and in the latter both devices were exposed simultaneously to the same conditions. The Mini device gave comparable results to the 10% breakthrough times and adsorption capacities of the organic vapor cartridges. The reproducibility of the packed carbon bed of the Mini provided strong support for using the Mini in breakthrough experiments for the characterization of the activated carbon adsorption capacity and estimation of cartridge service life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it