CD44s expression mitigates the phenotype of human colorectal cancer hepatic metastases.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alterations in expression of the CD44 adhesion protein have been implicated in colorectal tumourigenesis. Overexpression of variant high molecular weight isoforms (especially CD44v6), as well as down-regulation of standard CD44 (CD44s), are postulated to result in increased tumourigenicity. We studied the metastatic phenotype produced by the expression of CD44s by stable transfection into a human colorectal carcinoma cell line, SW620, that shows absence of any CD44 expression. Splenic injection of 2 x 10(6) SW620 colon cancer cells into SCID mice was used to produce hepatic metastases. The animals were sacrificed at 6 weeks after injection and morphological end-points relating to macrometastases and micrometastases were studied CD44s expression was associated with decreased development of macroscopic tumours (0.9 vs 3.0 tumours/ mouse liver, p = 0.004), less extensive tumour replacement of the liver (2.6% vs 12.8%, p = 0. 04) and decreased numbers of micrometastases (3.8 x 10(-8) vs 7.9 x 10(-8) micrometastases/ microm2, p = 0.2). This study is the first to demonstrate the mitigating effect of CD44s expression on the hepatic metastatic phenotype in a colorectal carcinoma cell line that does not ordinarily express CD44.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".