MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2414461007 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2009-0051

DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF AN INDOOR LOCALIZATION SYSTEM FOR THE OMNIBOT OMNI-DIRECTIONAL PLATFORM

2009· article· en· W2414461007 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Sasha Ginzburg, Florentin von Frankenberg, Scott Nokleby

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology
KeywordsTrilaterationBeaconGlobal Positioning SystemCeiling (cloud)Positioning systemComputer scienceReal-time computingPosition (finance)Indoor positioning systemTracking systemNavigation systemSimulationEmbedded systemEngineeringArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsKalman filterAccelerometer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design and implementation of an indoor absolute localization system for a novel three-degree-of-freedom (DOF) omni-directional mobile platform is presented. This localization system is a modification of the Cricket indoor localization system developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and is similar to the Global Positioning System (GPS) used in outdoor applications. The designed system has an active mobile architecture with actively transmitting beacons mounted on the mobile platform, and receivers (listeners) fixed at known positions on the ceiling of the operating environment. Position estimates of the mobile beacons, relative to a global coordinate system, are obtained using trilateration; a technique that determines the position of a beacon using distance estimates between the beacon and the fixed listeners. The distance estimates between the beacons and listeners are calculated using the time-of-flight of radio frequency and ultrasonic signals. Testing of the localization system was performed and experimental results are presented. These preliminary results indicate that the modified Cricket system has improved accuracy in distance and position estimation compared to the original system, as well as a higher position update rate when performing tracking of the mobile platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207