MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2414562351 · doi:10.1112/s0024609305004716

Counting Zeros of <i>C</i> <sup>1</sup> Fredholm Maps of Index 1

2005· article· en· W2414562351 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julián López-Gómez, Carlos Mora‐Corral

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the London Mathematical Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsMathematics Subject ClassificationFredholm integral equationFredholm determinantDegree (music)Fredholm operatorFredholm theoryInvariant (physics)Parity (physics)Banach spaceMathematical analysisPure mathematicsCombinatoricsIntegral equationCompact operatorMathematical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The degree defined by P. Benevieri and M. Furi (see ‘A simple notion of orientability for Fredholm maps of index zero between Banach manifolds and degree theory’, Ann. Sci. Math. Québec 22 (1998) 131–148) is used here to obtain some sharp lower bounds for the number of solutions of the λ-sections of the compact components of the set of non-trivial solutions of F(λ, x) = 0, where F is a C1 Fredholm map of index 1 such that F(λ, 0) = 0 for all λ ∈ R. These bounds are given in terms of the parity of the linearized Fredholm family D2F(·, 0). The parity is a local invariant measuring the change of the orientation of D2F(λ, 0) as λ crosses an interval. The set of eigenvalues of D2F(·, 0) is not assumed to be discrete. Therefore, even in the classical situation when F is a compact perturbation of the identity, the results presented here are completely new. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 47J15, 58C30 (primary), 47H11, 58C40 (secondary).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the London Mathematical SocietySame topicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical SystemsFrench-language works237,207